From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: reiser4 performance Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:56:36 -0500 Message-ID: <42F7B8F4.80101@slaphack.com> References: <200508081409.03814.rmeijer@internet.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200508081409.03814.rmeijer@internet.gr> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: "Raymond A. Meijer" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Raymond A. Meijer wrote: > On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote: > > >>Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers >>better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make >>it into the stable 2.6 kernel? > > > If only it had a resizer :( Resizer isn't such a big deal. I can usually find enough backup for enough of what I want, and I usually get sizes right the first time. What I want is the repacker, beacuse performance does steadily degrade on my Reiser4 systems, eventually getting worse than Reiser3, but not worse than VFAT -- probably because my old FAT partitions are on old, virus-ridden systems. I will stick with Reiser4 for now, and hope the repacker comes soon. I don't resize that often, but I'd like to repack every couple weeks or so, and it's not worth it to find that much backup (DVDs) that often.