From: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: libata total system lockup fix
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 11:16:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42F8C8D0.2010603@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42F2E267.50402@gmail.com>
Tejun,
I'm back from holiday now, and will try your one-liner
in place of the more complex patch I had been using.
(that's what you intended, right?)
Should know within a few hours whether it solves this
problem here or not.
cheers
--
Mark Lord
Real-Time Remedies Inc.
mlord@pobox.com
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>
>> >The problem with this patch is that is causes leaks, and doesn't
>> actually ready the devices because scsi_eh_ready_devs() is never
>> called: scsi_eh_abort_cmds() is guaranteed to fail out every time its
>> called.
>>
>> MMmm.. bummer if that's the case, but it does execute here
>> on my machine about once every two seconds, continuously,
...
> Hello, Mark Lord.
>
> I think I've hit similar scsi-eh lockup problem during development of
> new EH/NCQ helpers. I currently don't remember where it exactly looped,
> but I recall that scmds jumped back and forth between two lists, one of
> which being eh_cmd_q which isn't cleared properly by SATA's strategy
> routine. Anyways, I'm attaching an one liner quick fix, which I'm not
> sure if it will work or not. Also, I'll post a combined patch of my new
> EH/NCQ helpers in a separate mail, which, hopefully, should be free of
> this issue.
>
> Please try out these two and let me know how they go. Here's the one
> liner against v2.6.12.
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ int ata_scsi_error(struct Scsi_Host *hos
> * appropriate place
> */
> host->host_failed--;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&host->eh_cmd_q);
>
> DPRINTK("EXIT\n");
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-09 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-25 13:47 libata total system lockup fix Mark Lord
2005-07-25 14:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-07-25 15:53 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-05 3:52 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-05 4:01 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-11 20:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-12 0:49 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 2:22 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-12 2:38 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 2:41 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-09 15:16 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2005-08-09 23:54 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-10 14:16 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-10 21:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-08-19 0:46 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 3:21 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 3:36 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 3:45 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-19 4:01 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 9:37 ` Erik Slagter
2005-08-19 9:35 ` Erik Slagter
2005-08-19 13:07 ` Mark Lord
2005-08-19 13:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-08-19 13:37 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-09-03 22:58 ` Mark Lord
2005-09-03 23:06 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42F8C8D0.2010603@pobox.com \
--to=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.