From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2bUp-0003AN-Ji for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:18:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E2bUm-00038U-8O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:18:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E2bUm-00038R-69 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:18:48 -0400 Received: from [83.175.144.121] (helo=chilan.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1E2bfK-00072D-Jk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 17:29:43 -0400 Message-ID: <42F91CCE.4070206@kadu.net> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 23:14:54 +0200 From: Adrian Smarzewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Binary package and the kqemu support. References: <200508091224.18758.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> <42F88A66.9010409@kadu.net> <42F8CD83.100@enix.org> <200508091702.39938.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200508091702.39938.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: > However the qemu 0.7.1 binaries distributed from the qemu website include > kqemu support. This means you are entitled to kqemu.h (which is necessary to > compile kqemu.c) under the LGPL. > > By distributing kqemu enabled qemu binaries Fabrice has implicitly > dual-licenced kqemu.h under both the LGPL and his kqemu proprietary licence. It's not clear, but fortunately it will be fixed - see Fabrices response in this thread. > > P.S. I'm going to make my usual plug, and say if you're bothered about > licencing issues you should be using qvm86. > amd64 :( -- Pozdrowienia, Adrian Smarzewski