From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Cc: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 performance
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:49:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42FB9DD7.6080003@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e692861c05080818551a300f36@mail.gmail.com>
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>On 8/8/05, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:
>
>
>>"Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's
>>getting even better pretty fast.
>>
>>And, by the way, if the transaction interface gets done, it's not just
>>databases that will benefit, but also small files. After all, what kind
>>of transactions are used for your OpenOffice document?
>>
>>
>...
>
>Well there doesn't actually need to be a transaction interface for
>postgresql's needs.. it just needs a fairly limited set of assurances
>from the VFS/FS that ... aren't usually provided. Beyond that, it
>already handles its own transactions. It looks like from Hans' reply
>the reiser4 already provides everything needed.. which I had
>suspected.
>
>
>
>
Well, but then you have to tell postgres that it can assume these things
about reiser4.....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-11 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-08 10:32 reiser4 performance Hemiplegic Menehune
2005-08-08 10:51 ` PFC
2005-08-08 11:09 ` Raymond A. Meijer
2005-08-08 13:38 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-08-08 16:44 ` PFC
2005-08-08 19:53 ` David Masover
2005-08-08 20:30 ` michael chang
2005-08-08 20:34 ` michael chang
2005-08-08 20:40 ` Bedros Hanounik
2005-08-08 20:58 ` michael chang
2005-08-08 21:41 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-08-08 20:51 ` Funding [Was:reiser4 performance] Pysiak Satriani
2005-08-08 19:56 ` reiser4 performance David Masover
2005-08-08 22:06 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-09 0:02 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 0:16 ` michael chang
2005-08-09 1:02 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 17:52 ` michael chang
2005-08-09 20:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-08-10 1:23 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 21:33 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-08 18:09 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-08 18:10 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-08 23:13 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-08 23:30 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-09 0:20 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 0:58 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-09 1:33 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 1:55 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-11 18:49 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2005-08-11 19:00 ` PFC
2005-08-11 21:29 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-09 2:03 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-10 1:34 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 1:51 ` Pat Double
2005-08-10 2:11 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 2:19 ` Pat Double
2005-08-10 2:32 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 2:49 ` Pat Double
2005-08-09 7:41 ` PFC
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 20:57 Pysiak Satriani
2005-08-08 22:42 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42FB9DD7.6080003@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=gmaxwell@gmail.com \
--cc=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.