From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: reiser4 performance Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:49:59 -0700 Message-ID: <42FB9DD7.6080003@namesys.com> References: <42F7A01A.7090209@namesys.com> <42F7F6DC.2080706@slaphack.com> <42F807D7.9090900@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Gregory Maxwell Cc: David Masover , ReiserFS List Gregory Maxwell wrote: >On 8/8/05, David Masover wrote: > > >>"Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's >>getting even better pretty fast. >> >>And, by the way, if the transaction interface gets done, it's not just >>databases that will benefit, but also small files. After all, what kind >>of transactions are used for your OpenOffice document? >> >> >... > >Well there doesn't actually need to be a transaction interface for >postgresql's needs.. it just needs a fairly limited set of assurances >from the VFS/FS that ... aren't usually provided. Beyond that, it >already handles its own transactions. It looks like from Hans' reply >the reiser4 already provides everything needed.. which I had >suspected. > > > > Well, but then you have to tell postgres that it can assume these things about reiser4.....