From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Perkel Subject: Re: Reiser4 and ACLs Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:52:43 -0700 Message-ID: <4301009B.3080808@perkel.com> References: <42FEC9F1.9040709@perkel.com> <20050814080812.GA22983@king.bitgnome.net> <42FF388F.3010506@perkel.com> <17151.17921.996376.693013@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87k6in5dri.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> <17152.63727.435377.223362@thebsh.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <17152.63727.435377.223362@thebsh.namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Nikita Danilov wrote: >Sorry, it seems I was too vague. It's exactly the opposite: standard >xattr API was abandoned in favour of accessing EAs and ACLs through >pseudo files. The latter method is not implemented yet, and I don't know >how stable sys_reiser4() API is currently. Hans is the proper person to >ask. > > > Why not have more than one interface if you need that? Is there any reason for not supporting the standard that is in the kernel now? Reiser 3 supports it.