From: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? [SOLVED]
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43031223.4020901@bootc.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42FE0ACE.6010506@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Chris Boot wrote:
>
>> Some interesting developments!
>>
>> I installed a fresh copy of Windows, and all the VIA and nVidia and
>> so on drivers. At some point during all this (a period of relatively
>> heavy disk IO), the computer seemed to crash and I rebooted it. It
>> then worked fine for a while, but during my perfmon testing it
>> seemed to do the same thing. This time I left it for a while and it
>> did eventually wake up again, so I'm guessing the controller is a
>> bit fubared. Perfmon did indeed show several dips down to or very
>> close to 0 during the write operation, with peaks up to 48 MB/sec,
>> which is pretty respectable. So, time to replace the brand-new
>> controller I guess.
>>
>> Now, do you think this is just my one particular controller card and
>> a simple return would fix the problem, or is it more likely a
>> problem with the whole range? It's an Innovision EIO SATA
>> controller: http:// www.ivmm.com/eio/products/index.htm
>>
>> Would it be a safer bet to go for the Adaptec controller of the same
>> variety? How reliable are they?
>
>
> I frankly don't know. Maybe it's just one faulty controller,
> connector or whatever. Maybe the card manufacturer screwed up
> somewhere. I mean, the only course I took in electronics is
> introductory digital circuits which used 74xx chips and push triggered
> clock on a breadboard. What would I know about gigahertz signaling
> error. :-p
>
> Though, one thing I can say is majority of 311x controllers don't
> seem to suffer from this problem. So, take your pick.
>
Right, I've replaced my previous controller with an Adaptec AHA-1205SA,
and I'm rebulding 2 RAID-1 arrays at 50MB/sec without a hitch.
Thanks for your help diagnosing my problem, it was much appreciated!
Many thanks,
Chris
--
Chris Boot
bootc@bootc.net
http://www.bootc.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-17 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-11 21:55 SiI 3112A + Seagate HDs = still no go? Chris Boot
2005-08-12 3:24 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 10:57 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 11:28 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 11:33 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 13:23 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 14:08 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-12 16:27 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 16:27 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-13 1:13 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-13 12:14 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-13 14:59 ` Tejun Heo
2005-08-17 10:32 ` Chris Boot [this message]
2005-08-12 15:19 ` Roger Heflin
2005-08-12 15:19 ` Roger Heflin
2005-08-12 15:20 ` Chris Boot
2005-08-12 15:20 ` Chris Boot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43031223.4020901@bootc.net \
--to=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.