From: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Cc: gary <guohuizou2000@sina.com>, "'Марк Коренберг'" <socketpair@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BLA and gateway mode
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:12:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4303236.klkYGd5fVA@prime> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <029001d46451$32dd4ec0$9897ec40$@sina.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2080 bytes --]
Hi Gary,
when the loss happens, for how long does it happen? Do you see where/why the
ping packets get dropped? That should be the first step to find out, IMHO.
Changing the gateway should be working in general [1]. It's also possible that
the loss is mesh related and the gateway change happens due to a node failing
in your mesh - that would be a problem independent of BLA.
I hope those suggestions help you to find out the problem. :)
Cheers,
Simon
[1] https://www.open-mesh.org/projects/batman-adv/wiki/Bridge-loop-avoidance-Testcases#A-client-switches-its-gateway-due-to-loss-of-linkbetter-TQ
On Monday, October 15, 2018 2:34:53 PM CEST gary wrote:
> Hi, guys,
>
> I meet an issue related to bla.
> There are two backbone nodes on backbone LAN, and many mesh nodes connected
> with the two backbone nodes. When I run ping test on one client, there is
> about 20% packet loss. And I find out the packet is always loss when the
> client is switch from one backbone node to another one(observing "batctl
> cl" on backbone node).
>
> Do you have any suggestion for the issue?
>
> Thanks very much.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: B.A.T.M.A.N <b.a.t.m.a.n-bounces@lists.open-mesh.org> On Behalf Of
> Sven Eckelmann Sent: 2018年10月12日 14:06
> To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
> Cc: Марк Коренберг <socketpair@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BLA and gateway mode
>
> On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 10:55:02 CEST Марк Коренберг wrote:
> > Hello, guys.
> >
> > Does anybody know if BLA is somehow connected with gateway mode ?
>
> No it isn't connected.
>
> > In
> > short, I'm unsure if gateway mode algorythms influence only DHCP
> > traffic. It is not strictly said. Documentation about BLA II use term
> > "gateway". As afr as I understand, there maybe case when BLA gateway
> > is one node, and DHCP gateway is another one.
>
> Correct
>
> > So, the question: does
> > GW functionality influence BLA algorythms ?
>
> No
>
> Kind regards,
> Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-15 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 5:55 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] BLA and gateway mode Марк Коренберг
2018-10-12 6:05 ` Sven Eckelmann
2018-10-15 6:34 ` gary
2018-10-15 10:12 ` Simon Wunderlich [this message]
2018-10-16 9:50 ` gary
2018-10-16 10:00 ` Simon Wunderlich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4303236.klkYGd5fVA@prime \
--to=sw@simonwunderlich.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=guohuizou2000@sina.com \
--cc=socketpair@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.