From: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>
To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:07:23 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430424.80078.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
Well, I can get the 16 port adaptecs for the same price ($100) from a local shop disposing of servers from failed companies. So the price isn't an issue. It's density. I'd like to be able to hang 24+ drives off one system, so I can't get there by using 4 port PCI-E cards. Not enough slots, and the 4 port cards cost almost as much as the 16 port port adaptecs I can get.
What I am asking about is the comparative performance of 8 and 16 port SATA controllers being used in software raid. It makes no sense to do this if you are paying retail prices for them I know...
So, back to the question at hand - what is the best performing 8 or 16 port SATA controller (hardware raid on board or not) available?
Thx
Mike
----- Original Message ----
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: Mike Myers <mikesm559@yahoo.com>; linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2008 5:19:46 AM
Subject: Re: Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid
Dear Justin Piszcz,
In message <alpine.DEB.1.10.0810310813240.468@p34.internal.lan> you wrote:
>
> > We made really good experience with the Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 cards.
...
> Lets be frank- almost all(?) RAID controllers you must export the disks
> via JBOD and they cost hundreds to thousands of dollars. Doing SW RAID
> via JBOD IMO is not a great idea-- I'd use individual 2 or 4 port SATA
> controllers on PCI-e.
Right. The AOC-SAT2-MV8 is a 8 port PCI-X controller without any RAID
support - and costs just around $ 100. That's why I like it.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
The optimum committee has no members.
- Norman Augustine
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 18:07 Mike Myers [this message]
2008-10-31 19:58 ` Adaptec raid congtrollers for SATA disks under software raid Wolfgang Denk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-31 19:23 Mike Myers
2008-10-31 18:09 Mike Myers
2008-10-31 18:48 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-10-31 5:21 David Lethe
2008-10-31 4:37 Mike Myers
2008-10-31 10:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 12:14 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-10-31 12:19 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-10-31 12:22 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430424.80078.qm@web30802.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=mikesm559@yahoo.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.