From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brent Clark Subject: Re: port 80 out new ISP Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:22:56 +0200 Message-ID: <43061570.9090702@eccotours.dyndns.org> References: <430600E4.3090004@eccotours.dyndns.org> <200508191205.22196.rob0@gmx.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200508191205.22196.rob0@gmx.co.uk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: /dev/rob0 Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi Rob A big thanks for replying to my email. >>ip route flush table TELKOM >>/dev/null >>ip route show table main |grep -Ev ^default\ > > > What does this command, without the "\" and pipe, return? > gate:~# ip route show table main | grep -Ev ^default 196.36.10.112/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 196.36.10.114 192.168.111.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.111.10 192.168.10.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.100 gate:~# >>ip rule add fwmark 1 table TELKOM >> /dev/null > > > And what do your routing rules show at this point? gate:~# ip rule show 0: from all lookup local 32765: from all fwmark 0x1 lookup TELKOM 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default gate:~# gate:~# ip route show table main 196.36.10.112/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 196.36.10.114 192.168.111.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.111.10 192.168.10.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.100 default via 196.36.10.113 dev eth0 gate:~# gate:~# ip route show table TELKOM 196.36.10.112/29 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 196.36.10.114 192.168.111.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.111.10 192.168.10.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.10.100 default via 192.168.10.200 dev eth2 gate:~# >># SNAT the Private LAN >>$IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s 192.168.111.0/24 -j SNAT >>--to-source 196.36.10.114 >>#$IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -s >>192.168.111.0/24 -j SNAT --to-source 192.168.10.200 > > > Why is that one commented? Im commented it out, hoping the MASQUERADE would work. > > >>$IPT -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth2 -s 192.168.111.0/24 -j MASQUERADE > > > MASQUERADE will not work with dual routing. Thanks