All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott McNutt <smcnutt@psyent.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:41:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <430A0031.9070304@psyent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4309F122.5090907@orkun.us>

Tolunay Orkun wrote:

> The point is you can simply use already available "protect off"

Not to add fuel to the fire ;-) ... but in the past, I did precisely
what Tolunay suggests. I just added a "protect off" to the boot command
to explicitly unprotect specific sectors. It worked just fine -- and
I did not consider the techique to lack convenience.

On-the-other-hand, preventing automatic "UN-protection" in this case
is _policy_ enforcement -- we would be making technical decisions for
others, for applications we know nothing about -- this, I am sure,
is not the u-boot "spirit" that I have observed over the past 5 years.

That being said, a default that does not automatically un-protect
seems appropriate -- or find a way to push the auto un-protect
capability into the board-specific tree.

Regards,
--Scott

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-08-22 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-19  4:27 [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-19 18:36 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22  5:37   ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22  6:31     ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22  7:13       ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22 15:37         ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 16:17           ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 16:49             ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 20:49               ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 16:41           ` Scott McNutt [this message]
2005-08-23  1:53           ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-22  7:58       ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 17:02         ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 20:53           ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-22 22:05             ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-22 22:46               ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-23  7:14                 ` Yuli Barcohen
2005-08-23  8:39                   ` Sangmoon Kim
2005-08-23 14:47                 ` Brian Waite
2005-08-23 20:24                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-24  5:58                     ` Yuli Barcohen
2005-08-24 16:00                     ` Detlev Zundel
2005-08-24 21:52                       ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-24 23:12                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2005-08-25 14:37                           ` Brian Waite
2005-08-25 16:37                           ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-26 14:12                             ` U-Boot policy on flash protection (was [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches) Detlev Zundel
2005-08-26 14:45                               ` Wolfgang Denk
2006-02-28 16:34 ` [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] cfi_flash.c patches Wolfgang Denk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-19 18:47 Woodruff, Richard
2005-08-19 20:16 ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-08-19 20:22 Woodruff, Richard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=430A0031.9070304@psyent.com \
    --to=smcnutt@psyent.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.