From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: tidy up requested Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:10:24 -0500 Message-ID: <430A1510.9030101@us.ibm.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: Rusty Russell , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ok, I'm writing up the patch for this right now. Just want to confirm the following is all sane: Ian Pratt wrote: >install > find . -type f | grep -v /lib/modules | grep -v /boot >./usr/lib/libxc.so.3.0.0 >./usr/lib/libxc.a >./usr/lib/libxenstore.a >./usr/lib/libxenstore-pic.a > > > /usr/lib/libxenctl.so.3.0.0 /usr/lib/libxenctl.a /usr/lib/libxenstore.a /usr/lib/libxenstore-pic.a Why are we installed libxenstore as a PIC .a and a normal .a and not as just a shared object and a normal .a? >I guess the above are OK. Makes me wander whether we should >rename libxc to libxenc ??? > >./usr/include/xc.h >./usr/include/xs.h >./usr/include/xs_lib.h >./usr/include/xcs_proto.h > > /usr/include/xen/xenctl.h /usr/include/xen/xenstore.h /usr/include/xen/xenstore_lib.h (we no longer need to install xcs_proto.h) Everything else on Ian's list seems to be universally agreed upon. Regards, Anthony Liguori >Should the above be under a /usr/include/xen too? > >_______________________________________________ >Xen-devel mailing list >Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > >