From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zef <zef@fcvnet.net>
Subject: Re: netfilter benchmarks on two gigabit ethernet cards
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:57:09 +0200
Message-ID: <430AE4E5.5050806@fcvnet.net>
References: <430A2E53.8040000@fcvnet.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0508230848310.22824@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508230848310.22824@blackhole.kfki.hu>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

Jozsef Kadlecsik a =E9crit :

>Hi,
>
>On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Zef wrote:
>
> =20
>
>>do you know any benchmarks showing packet per seconds filtering power o=
f
>>netfilter running on X86 platforms with two gigabit cards?
>>   =20
>>
>
>http://people.netfilter.org/kadlec/nftest.pdf summaries the results of
>such tests we performed at the beginning of this year.
>
>Best regards,
>Jozsef
>-
>E-mail  : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlec@sunserv.kfki.hu
>PGP key : http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt
>Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
>          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
>
> =20
>
Waooh, very nice results!
Thanks also to Stephen for his answer.

Do you think that something like a Dell PowerEdge* *SC1425 would be a=20
good low cost gigabit firewall?

Zef'