From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH 2/2] pagefault scalability alternative
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 23:29:10 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <430B24A6.5010906@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508231333330.7718@goblin.wat.veritas.com>
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>Which brings up another issue - this surely conflicts rather
>>badly with PageReserved removal :( Not that there is anything
>>wrong with that, but I don't like to create these kinds of
>>problems for people...
>
>
> Conflicts in the sense that I'm messing all over source files which
> removing PageReserved touches?
>
> Or in some deeper sense, that it makes the whole project of removing
> PageReserved more difficult (I don't see how)?
>
No, just diff conflicts.
>
>>Do we still want to remove PageReserved sooner rather than
>>later?
>
>
> I'd say remove PageReserved sooner;
> or at least your "remove it from the core" subset.
>
OK so long as you're still happy with that. You'd been
a bit quiet on the subject and I had just been assuming
that's because you've got no more big objections to it.
Just wanted to clarify - thanks.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-22 21:27 [RFT][PATCH 0/2] pagefault scalability alternative Hugh Dickins
2005-08-22 21:29 ` [RFT][PATCH 1/2] " Hugh Dickins
2005-08-22 21:31 ` [RFT][PATCH 2/2] " Hugh Dickins
2005-08-23 0:25 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-23 7:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-23 11:20 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-23 13:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-23 13:29 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-08-23 16:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-23 5:39 ` Andi Kleen
2005-08-23 7:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-22 22:29 ` [RFT][PATCH 0/2] " Christoph Lameter
2005-08-23 0:32 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-23 7:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-23 8:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-23 10:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-08-23 16:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-08-23 16:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-08-23 18:29 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-08-27 22:10 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=430B24A6.5010906@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.