From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dev.rtsoft.ru (RT-soft-2.Moscow.itn.ru [80.240.96.70]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05B2968085 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:43:58 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <430C7C3A.4000601@ru.mvista.com> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:55:06 +0400 From: Andrei Konovalov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Likely References: <20050823170300.GA910@siegfried.thelikelysolution.ca> In-Reply-To: <20050823170300.GA910@siegfried.thelikelysolution.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Source of xparameter_ml300.h List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Grant Likely wrote: > Does anyone know the origin of xparameter_ml300.h? The > Xilinx EDK generates an xparameters.h file for each design, but the > structure of the file changes between releases. > > I want to know if xparameters_ml300.h is the exact output produced by > EDK or if stuff was changed before it was submitted to the mainline > tree. (ie. all the stuff under the "linux redefines" comment block) EDK can also generate the "Linux BSP". In this case EDK uses the scripts from (depending on your setup) /opt/xilinx/edk/7.1/sw/ThirdParty/bsp/linux_v2_00_b/data/ In particular, linux_v2_1_0.tcl adds those "linux redefines" and renames xparameters.h to xparameters_ml300.h. > Also, where can I get the bitstream/systemace file that matches > xparameters_ml300.h? The most reliable way is to generate both (bitstream and xparameters_ml300.h) by yourself. :) But if you are speaking about the xparameters_ml300.h in the community trees (linuxppc-2.4 and the 2.6 one from kernel.org), this file is for the reference design by Xilinx: http://www.xilinx.com/ise/embedded/edk6_2docs/ml300_edk3.zip > I've got a custom ml300 image that I'm regression > testing against, but I'd like to also test against some form of 'stock' > image. :) > > Thanks, > g. Thanks, Andrei