From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [RFC] TTL target goes mainline ? Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:24:28 +0200 Message-ID: <430F342C.7050007@trash.net> References: <20050826111832.GT4226@rama.de.gnumonks.org> <430F007B.20605@trash.net> <20050826131901.GY4226@rama.de.gnumonks.org> <430F1C07.5020305@trash.net> <20050826151655.GA5606@linuxace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Phil Oester In-Reply-To: <20050826151655.GA5606@linuxace.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Phil Oester wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:41:27PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>Sure :) I just think its nicer than to enable "sub-functionality" by >>config options, so if its there, its usable. I also don't think there >>are people who actually have CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL disabled, so in >>the end, we just save a few ifdefs in the code. > > Agree that almost everyone enables CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. How about > an IP_NF_TARGET_TTL_DEC which depends on IP_NF_TARGET_TTL, and which > has a nice big warning about being dangerous? I think documenting the issue is enough, users have plenty of ways of shooting themselves.