From: "Karsten M. Self" <karsten@xensource.com>
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: domU NFS performance
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:16:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43135EF5.8070604@xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b6116b305082902295d8c903b@mail.gmail.com>
Nicholas Lee wrote:
>I've written up a short review of the past few months experimenting
>with a Xen based Ubuntu NX thin client server.
>
>http://stateless.geek.nz/2005/08/29/xen-disk-performance/
>
>I'm wondering if other people have experience similar stalling issues
>with NFS services in a domU. Is it a known issue?
>
>
Nicholas: I'm with Keir, this shouldn't be happening. I'm with
XenSource QA, this looks like an interesting situation.
Could you provide us with some additional information (some you've
already given).
There's a script I've written to gather system information called, oddly
enough, system-info. Find a copy at
http://linuxmafia.com/~karsten/Download/system-info (I'll see about
getting this to the Cambridge site, we're looking at using this here).
Try running that on both the DomU and physical system as this will give
us an idea of your system state as well.
You might also want to:
- Provide specific NFS version info.
- Check system logs on client and server for any possible related info.
- Monitor traffic (tcpdump, ethereal, iptraf) to determine if latency
is visible at network / protocol level.
- Provide specific network hardware specs. We *are* seeing issues
with specific cards, and have seen some quirks with hub/switch
configurations.
My own experience with mutt is that it can be notoriously laggy
particularly dealing with large or frequently updated mailboxes. It may
not be the best general purpose network performance test tool. Perhaps
netperf (packaged for Debian) would be more useful.
As Kier indicates, we're largely dogfooding internally with services run
via Xen DomUs, so this is a bit of a puzzler.
Cheers.
--
Karsten M. Self <karsten@xensource.com>
XenSource, Inc.
2300 Geng Road #250 +1 650.798.5900 x259
Palo Alto, CA 94303 +1 650.493.1579 fax
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-29 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-29 9:29 domU NFS performance Nicholas Lee
2005-08-29 9:57 ` Keir Fraser
2005-08-29 10:23 ` Nicholas Lee
2005-08-29 10:56 ` Keir Fraser
2005-08-29 11:58 ` Nicholas Lee
2005-08-29 19:16 ` Karsten M. Self [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43135EF5.8070604@xensource.com \
--to=karsten@xensource.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.