From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: phil@edgedesign.us (Philip Edelbrock)
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:17:54 +0000
Subject: [lm-sensors] Call for 2.9.2
Message-Id: <43162C66.3030505@edgedesign.us>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20050716170208.7c1f7e3d.khali@linux-fr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050716170208.7c1f7e3d.khali@linux-fr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Are we ready for release?  Any outstanding issues? (Jean?)


Phil

Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Jean:
> 
> * Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> [2005-08-30 22:31:52 +0200]:
> 
>>OK, so it seems to be the right time for the 2.9.2 release. Philip, are
>>you ready to go?
> 
> 
> As I pointed out on #linux-sensors, there is what I consider to be a bug in
> the /sys/class/hwmon handling: if /sys/class/hwmon is not present, SPD/eeproms
> will be read normally by sensors(1); but if it *is* present, then SPD/eeproms
> will not be found or displayed.
> 
> Even if we plan to get rid of SPD/eeprom reading from sensors(1) (which I
> think is sensible), the current behavior is surprising, to say the least.
> 
> I'm sorry I haven't had time to work up a fix - I have a four-day weekend
> coming up during which I should have some time.  At any rate, IMO it's a
> release-stopper.
> 
> Regards,
>