From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Xiaofeng Ling <xiaofeng.ling@intel.com>
Subject: question about page_to_phys
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 09:29:50 +0800
Message-ID: <4316598E.4010108@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

The page_to_phys is defined as
#define page_to_phys(page)   (phys_to_machine(page_to_pseudophys(page)))
so it return machine addresss
while virt_to_phys return psedophys. include/asm-xen/asm-i386/io.h
this is really confusing.
why not define page_to_machine?