From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Staubach Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:14:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4317451F.3000808@redhat.com> References: <20050901134604.31ddd297@SiRiUS.home> <20050901144842.34629bcf@SiRiUS.home> <4316F9CC.2090904@namesys.com> <20050901150507.3d6f53c7@SiRiUS.home> <4316FD28.5020304@redhat.com> <43171D57.3030007@namesys.com> <431726F2.1090508@redhat.com> <43173463.40302@slaphack.com> <43173A11.2000801@namesys.com> <43173C20.7070107@redhat.com> <43174176.9010203@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <43174176.9010203@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Hans Reiser Cc: David Masover , vs@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hans Reiser wrote: > >Journaling, and reserving space for good allocation, are totally >different concerns, I don't understand why you guys are conflating them. > Agreed, that journaling and reserving space for good allocation are separate, except that often the space for the journal is reserved. Only being able to see one measurement that indicates space reserved from the file system makes it confusing. Thanx... ps