All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Use proper casting with signed timespec.tv_nsec values
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 23:37:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4317749E.3020109@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1125608627.22448.4.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com>

john stultz a écrit :
> All,
> 	I recently ran into a bug with an older kernel where xtime's tv_nsec
> field had accumulated more then 2 seconds worth of time. The timespec's
> tv_nsec is a signed long, however gettimeofday() treats it as an
> unsigned long. Thus when the failure occured, very strange and difficult
> to debug time problems occurred.
> 
> The main cause of the problem I was seeing is already fixed in mainline,
> however just to be safe, I figured the following patch would be wise.
> 
> I only audited i386 and x86_64, however other arches probably could have
> similar signed problems as well.
> 
> Please let me know if you have any further comments or feedback.

What happens on i386 when/if more than 4 seconds accumulate ?
That should happens too.
Maybe the real fix is elsewhere ?

> 
> thanks
> -john
> 
> linux-2.6.13_signed-tv_nsec_A0.patch
> ====================================
> --- a/kernel/timer.c
> +++ b/kernel/timer.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static void update_wall_time(unsigned lo
>  	do {
>  		ticks--;
>  		update_wall_time_one_tick();
> -		if (xtime.tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
> +		if ((unsigned long)xtime.tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
>  			xtime.tv_nsec -= 1000000000;
>  			xtime.tv_sec++;
>  			second_overflow();
> 

maybe here a :

while ((unsigned long)xtime.tv_nsec >= 1000000000) {
	xtime.tv_nsec -= 1000000000;
	xtime.tv_sec++;
	second_overflow();
	...
	}


Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-01 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-01 21:03 [RFC][PATCH] Use proper casting with signed timespec.tv_nsec values john stultz
2005-09-01 21:37 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2005-09-01 22:25   ` john stultz
2005-09-02  1:14 ` George Anzinger
2005-09-06 17:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-06 19:54   ` john stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4317749E.3020109@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.