From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Some questions about r4
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:15:01 -0700
Message-ID: <43177D65.4070003@namesys.com>
References: <431743196ebaa@wp.pl> <e692861c05090111192a7d9ea6@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-25809-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <e692861c05090111192a7d9ea6@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Cc: Reiserfs List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

Gregory Maxwell wrote:

>On 9/1/05, Pysiak Satriani <pysiak.satriani@wp.pl> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>Is there a r4-patch cooking for 2.6.13 ?
>>Is the requirement for not enabling 4k-stacks going away soon?
>>If I patch a vanilla kernel with r4, and sop using r4, would you say that the changes I introduced by patching are rather safe to the rest of the kernel, or would you recomend going back to vanilla just in case?
>>    
>>
>
>On this point: 2.6.13 is out, is there going to be a pass at getting
>reiser4 into 2.6.14?
>
>
>  
>
Yes, but the latest crashed during testing today, so we delay until at
least tomorrow.