Re: [RFC] libata new EH document

[Luben Tuikov <luben_tuikov@adaptec.com>]

On 09/01/05 18:23, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 18:07 -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> 
>>>Well, not really, since it's basic SCSI and the explanation's pretty
>>>long.  However, the standards have several pages about it.  For your
>>>reading pleasure, I suggest SAM-2 section 5.9.1 Contingent allegiance
>>>(CA) and auto contingent allegiance (ACA)
>>
>>SCSI Core knows nothing about ACA and/or how to use it.
> 
> 
> I don't recall ever claiming that it did.  The discussion was about how
> the error handler clears contingent allegiance conditions.

:-)

So are you claiming that 
    "the error handler clears contingent allegiance conditions" ?

Please point me to the lines in the source code where it does this
and how it does it.

>>You should also know that no one actually spells out CA or ACA,
>>they just use the capitalized abbreviation, plus the fact that
>>CA is obsolete.
> 
> 
> Lets just say I'm TLA averse.
> 
> 
>>Stop impressing the children!
> 
> 
> Is that what people who constantly refer to standards are trying to do?
> I must say I did wonder ...

Yes, there's a bunch of us here, count DG too.

	Luben