From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <431946EC.4090804@domain.hid> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 09:47:08 +0300 From: Heikki Lindholm MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] adeos i386 and ppc patches forward ported to 2.6.13 References: <1125495609.4643.16.camel@domain.hid> <20050831193733.w5f2d662w0gswwkg@domain.hid> <20050831211425.GA32230@domain.hid> <20050901104750.c0mpu3q4pkc088wg@domain.hid> <1125577206.4641.8.camel@domain.hid> <1125579791.4685.2.camel@domain.hid> <4316FD8F.30203@domain.hid> <1125581425.4639.3.camel@domain.hid> <20050901155220.ifckrl94w00gksg8@domain.hid> <1125583963.4635.0.camel@domain.hid> <20050901164619.pn5h4cg34s0w4gok@domain.hid> <1125586184.4633.3.camel@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <1125586184.4633.3.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stelian Pop Cc: adeos-main@gna.org, Philippe Gerum Stelian Pop kirjoitti: > Le jeudi 01 septembre 2005 à 16:46 +0200, Philippe Gerum a écrit : > > >>Of, so if Heikki confirms that this patch works on ppc64, I guess that >>we have a >>brand new shiny bug to chase, with lots of headbanging sessions ahead. And I'm >>not talking about dance style here... > > > :) > > >>Ok, question #1: does this lockup only happen with latency, or is it also >>experienced with klatency? > > > I think I saw it only with latency. Did this happen mid-way while executing or only at the end, eg. modules unload phase? On the ppc64 port, I got an easily reproducible access exception after unloading rtai_native while unloading rtai_nucleus. -- Heikki Lindholm