From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kurt Fitzner <kfitzner@excelcia.org>
Subject: [parisc-linux] C160 lmbench results comparing HPUX & Linux
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:20:13 -0600
Message-ID: <431A138D.5010105@excelcia.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=ISO-8859-1
To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Return-Path: <parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org>
List-Id: parisc-linux developers list <parisc-linux.lists.parisc-linux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux>,
	<mailto:parisc-linux-request@lists.parisc-linux.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux>
List-Post: <mailto:parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org>
List-Help: <mailto:parisc-linux-request@lists.parisc-linux.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux>,
	<mailto:parisc-linux-request@lists.parisc-linux.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org

In the thread where I first posted about my C160 scoring much lower in
HPUX, someone mentioned that it might be better to offer lmbench
results.  Didn't have time before our summer-end camping trip, but I've
now finished this.

Raw results: http://www.excelcia.org/~kfitzner/misc/lmbench_c160_raw.tar.gz

PDF with graphs:
http://www.excelcia.org/~kfitzner/misc/lmbench_c160.pdf

The raw data has all three runs I performed on each OS.  The pdf graphs
have the first run for each OS since there is little variation in each run.

Anyone see anything significant here?  I don't really.

	Kurt.

_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux