From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Williams Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm1: hangs during boot ... Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:48:52 +1000 Message-ID: <431A2854.2000604@bigpond.net.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Brown, Len" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Brown, Len wrote: >>>>Please then try the latest ACPI patch here: >>> >>> > >> >>http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches >>/release/2.6.13/acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz >> >>> > It should apply to vanilla 2.6.13 with a reject in ia64/Kconfig >>> > that you can ignore. >>> > >>> > If this works, then we munged git-acpi.patch in >> >>2.6.13-mm1 somehow. >> >>> There were no problems with this patch applied. So it >> >>looks like the >> >>> munge theory is correct. >> >>That diff is significantly different from the diff I plucked from >>master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6 >>.git#test >>for 2.6.13-mm1. >> >>Doing (patch -R | grep FAILED) on 2.6.13-mm1 says: > > > Right. > 2.6.13/acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz > is newers than 2.6.13-rc1's git-acpi.patch > > 2.6.13/acpi-20050815-2.6.13.diff.gz > is a closer match -- though not exact. > > Peter, it might be illustrative if you have a moment > if you can also test 2.6.13/acpi-20050815-2.6.13.diff.gz > all by itself. > > If it fails, It does. > then I broke -mm1 > with acpi-20050815-2.6.13.diff.gz, but fixed > it by acpi-20050902-2.6.13.diff.gz. So you did. > > If it succeeds, then the issue lies in the relatively small delta > between acpi-20050815-2.6.13.diff.gz 2.6.13-mm1's git-acpi.patch. > > thanks, > -Len > My pleasure Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce