From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Herrmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] zfcp: introduce eh_timed_out handler Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:37:41 +0200 Message-ID: <431ACE75.3070502@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp07.web.de ([217.72.192.225]:36790 "EHLO smtp07.web.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717AbVIDKag (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2005 06:30:36 -0400 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, aherrman@de.ibm.com James, I wished I would have put patch 1/7 at the end of the patch series ;-( Because if patch 1 is not applied the other patches won't apply without rejects. I am on vacation for 1 week and I am not able to recreate the patches before 12th of September. Do you see any problems to bring the new features (patches 6/7 and 7/7) into 2.6.14 if I resend patches 2-7 that late? (I remember there is a deadline set by Linus for integration of new features into 2.6.14.) Regards, Andreas (PS: sorry for using this alternate email account)