From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Daniele Orlandi <daniele@orlandi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kernel Netdev Mailing List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:02:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <431E1FE9.7030405@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509070026.34999.daniele@orlandi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 650 bytes --]
Daniele Orlandi wrote:
> I'm looking at proto_unregister() in linux-2.6.13:
>
> Il calls kmem_cache_destroy() while holding proto_list_lock:
>
> void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot)
> {
> write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
>
> if (prot->slab != NULL) {
> kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab);
>
>
> However, kmem_cache_destroy() may sleep:
>
> /* Find the cache in the chain of caches. */
> down(&cache_chain_sem);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Am I seeing it right?
You're right, good catch. This patch fixes it by moving the lock
down to the list-operation which it is supposed to protect.
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]
[NET]: proto_unregister: fix sleeping while atomic
proto_unregister holds a lock while calling kmem_cache_destroy, which can
sleep.
Noticed by Daniele Orlandi <daniele@orlandi.com>.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
commit 90fdf8bc78b52d40190766c5496a3d8c24903be8
tree 54048218d981ab263b37e0de09ad52f4bd49a000
parent 591bd554f58b7d363167760a606d2a84696772da
author Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:00:00 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:00:00 +0200
net/core/sock.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1528,8 +1528,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(proto_register);
void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot)
{
- write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
-
if (prot->slab != NULL) {
kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab);
prot->slab = NULL;
@@ -1551,6 +1549,7 @@ void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot
prot->twsk_slab = NULL;
}
+ write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
list_del(&prot->node);
write_unlock(&proto_list_lock);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-06 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-06 22:26 proto_unregister sleeps while atomic Daniele Orlandi
2005-09-06 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-09-06 23:07 ` David S. Miller
2005-09-06 23:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-07 2:48 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=431E1FE9.7030405@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=daniele@orlandi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.