From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pablo Neira Subject: Re: New target: can't delete rule Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:58:59 +0200 Message-ID: <431F7EC3.7020902@eurodev.net> References: <1126116594.3690.35.camel@Pentium> <431F6A0E.1090707@eurodev.net> <431F6B0C.7070303@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gervasio Bernal , netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <431F6B0C.7070303@trash.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > Thanks, I didn't know about this problem. We should really focus on > a netlink interface to iptables once nf_conntrack is in, even without > pkttables. Should be really worthy the effort of implementing such netlink interface for iptables? I'm not too convinced. It'd be better if we spend our time implementing pkttables on top of netlink since it's meant to supersede all the functionalties provided by iptables. Anyway, I expect that there will be time to discuss this stuff during the workshop ;) -- Pablo