From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhai, Edwin" Subject: Re: [PATCH][VT] fix bug that service os&vmx guest can't communicate with each other. Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:41:44 +0800 Message-ID: <43203188.1040604@intel.com> References: <20050908100639.GA10656@edwin-gen.ccr> <523546dc2ecc8779032f0c1a5535cfb3@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <523546dc2ecc8779032f0c1a5535cfb3@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Pratt List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 8 Sep 2005, at 11:06, Edwin Zhai wrote: > >> fix bug that service os&vmx guest can't communicate with each other. >> Signed-off-by: Edwin Zhai >> Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Ling > > > Why is special treatment needed for small packets? Is this simply > masking a bug elsewhere -- the original qemu driver must have dealt > with small packets (e.g., TCP acks) correctly. extend the ether packet to 60 bytes else the guest ethernet driver will report error. in fact, the patch is borrowed from qemu ne2000. > > -- Keir >