From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhai, Edwin" Subject: Re: [PATCH][VT] fix bug that service os&vmx guest can't communicate with each other. Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:14:07 +0800 Message-ID: <4320391F.101@intel.com> References: <20050908100639.GA10656@edwin-gen.ccr> <523546dc2ecc8779032f0c1a5535cfb3@cl.cam.ac.uk> <43203188.1040604@intel.com> <69ffa344894eef77c5fa4f766ae7ec7b@cl.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <69ffa344894eef77c5fa4f766ae7ec7b@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Pratt List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: > > On 8 Sep 2005, at 13:41, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > >>> Why is special treatment needed for small packets? Is this simply >>> masking a bug elsewhere -- the original qemu driver must have dealt >>> with small packets (e.g., TCP acks) correctly. >> >> >> extend the ether packet to 60 bytes else the guest ethernet driver >> will report error. >> in fact, the patch is borrowed from qemu ne2000. > > > Fair enough. I guess you will push this patch to the vx-testing tree? it has already gone into xen-vtx-unstable tree :) > > -- Keir >