From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: fix ESP corruption CPU bug (take 2)
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:02:24 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <432438F0.4090003@aknet.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431C20560200007800023E6F@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com>
Hello.
Jan Beulich wrote:
> mainline, but I just now came across this, and following all of the
> original discussion that I was able to locate I didn't see any mention
> of a potential different approach to solving the problem which, as it
There were at least 3 fundamentally different
approaches proposed by different people, I implemented
and posted all of them. At least 2 approaches were
publically discussed. Both did what you say. The
one that didn't, wasn't publically discussed either
(the one that ended up in 2.6.12, in fact).
So it is a bit odd that you weren't able to find
the code that does what you say. :)
> would appear to me, requires much less code changes: Instead of
> allocating a separate stack to set intermediately, the 16-bit stack
> segment could be mapped directly onto the normal, flat kernel stack,
Do you mean, eg, this?
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0409.2/1533.html
Relevant quote:
---
> ring1 stacks must be per-CPU.
I allocate it on a ring0 stack. Noone seem to
suggest that. Is this flawed for some reasons?
---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-05 8:39 [patch] x86: fix ESP corruption CPU bug (take 2) Jan Beulich
2005-09-11 14:02 ` Stas Sergeev [this message]
2005-09-12 7:11 ` Jan Beulich
2005-09-12 16:57 ` Stas Sergeev
2005-09-13 7:34 ` Jan Beulich
2005-09-13 18:07 ` Stas Sergeev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-13 18:20 [patch] x86: fix ESP corruption CPU bug Stas Sergeev
2005-03-13 20:10 ` Pavel Machek
2005-03-13 20:55 ` Stas Sergeev
2005-03-13 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-13 22:06 ` [patch] x86: fix ESP corruption CPU bug (take 2) Stas Sergeev
2005-03-14 19:29 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-14 19:59 ` Stas Sergeev
2005-03-15 3:34 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-15 19:48 ` Stas Sergeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=432438F0.4090003@aknet.ru \
--to=stsp@aknet.ru \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.