From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: evilninja Subject: Re: we have got hash function screwed up Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:49:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4324B492.8090207@gmx.net> References: <431C738F.4010803@freemail.hu> <4322FD91.4060404@gmx.net> <200509110300.j8B30P7q013142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200509110300.j8B30P7q013142@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu schrieb: > Yes, I know there's needs to support borked legacy filesystems that were mkfs'ed > before the problem was recognized. That means fsck.reiserfs needs to know about > it - but mkfs.reiserfs?? Seen in the Fedora Core devel tree as of tonight: yeah, this "feature" of mkfs.reiserfs could be removed, but since reiserfs is in bugfixes-only-mode i don't see it happen. i am really curious though, why the OP used rupasov hash at all. r5 is the default algorithm for years now. -- BOFH excuse #80: That's a great computer you have there; have you considered how it would work as a BSD machine?