From: iSteve <isteve@rulez.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement?
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:11:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4326DE0E.2060306@rulez.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1EDpQq-0000iV-Oe@be1.lrz>
Okay, so, I have so far gathered:
- the whole module interface change between 2.4 and 2.6 was because
some security concerns, most of the stuff (loading module etc.) moved
towards kernel
- query_module is gone, there is no syscall similar in function but
with different name
- losing of query_module also prevents binary-only modules
(guesswork@work)
- /proc/modules and /sys/module interface doesn't by far supply what
query_module could do
My questions are:
a) Are my observations correct? Where did I go wrong?
b) Is there any planned replacement of query_module, or extendind sysfs
or procfs module interface?
c) Wouldn't revamping query_module also allow binary-only modules,
therefore easier decisions for vendors, whether to support Linux?
Thanks in advance and sorry for these probably quite silly questions.
- iSteve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-13 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4KSFY-2pO-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-09-09 20:25 ` query_modules syscall gone? Any replacement? Bodo Eggert
2005-09-09 20:33 ` iSteve
2005-09-13 14:11 ` iSteve [this message]
2005-09-13 15:15 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-13 15:30 ` iSteve
2005-09-13 15:44 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-13 16:26 ` iSteve
2005-09-13 16:52 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-09-13 19:50 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-13 15:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-09-09 15:02 iSteve
2005-09-09 15:27 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-09-09 16:10 ` iSteve
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4326DE0E.2060306@rulez.cz \
--to=isteve@rulez.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.