From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43283066.1000004@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:15:02 -0400 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: Karl MacMillan , Darrel Goeddel , SELinux , Nalin Dahyabhai Subject: Re: New ideas on implementation on libsetrans. References: <43271BDA.3060403@redhat.com> <43272C09.3050105@trustedcs.com> <43272E92.4060400@redhat.com> <1126641222.29303.235.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <432730B2.8090005@redhat.com> <1126641983.29303.249.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <43273782.7070600@redhat.com> <1126643563.2940.6.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <4327425F.8050805@redhat.com> <1126705174.12299.64.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1126705174.12299.64.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: >On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 17:19 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > > >>Ok I succumb, but we will go back to original implementation of >>libsetrans for now, and require anyone wishing to change the behaviour >>to replace our version with their own. so dlopen(libsetrans.so.1) will >>work. >> >>Eventually our version of libsetrans will use a UDS interface to talk to >>a long running daemon. >> >> > >Ok. Do you agree that libselinux should be dlopen'ing libsetrans.so >(and thus using the symlink that already exists under /usr/lib to >whatever the latest version is under /lib) rather than specifically >dlopen'ing libsetrans.so.0 as it does now? Of course, it may not matter >in practice as I can't see the interface ever changing (at least in a >way that requires bumping the .so version), but it seems cleaner. > > > I agree. Open /usr/lib/libsetrans.so -- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.