From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:42:29 +0000 Subject: Re: Sun v440 and 2.6.13-1.1552sp1smp (Aurora) kernel Message-Id: <432844E5.3020303@gentoo.org> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David S. Miller wrote: > The problem is that the people who can work on fixing > this problem (whether it is in the kernel or SILO, > we still don't know) are not able to reproduce it. The problem lies in SILO, we're using 1.2.6 in our (gentoo) v240 just fine to boot off disk. No kernel is rock-solid stable on the v240, though 2.4 lasts longer. I'm guessing it has to do with IIIi SMP since we get tons of "CPU[1]: Cheetah+ D-cache parity error at TPC[00000000005d3328]" (with varying CPU number and addresses) before one of the processors goes offline/gets stuck at which point it's time to reboot. - -- Gustavo Zacarias Gentoo/SPARC monkey -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDKETlV3G/IBCn/JARAhqdAJ4/Y+Y7Q+hLqWVteH96dSM+6j1BTwCfZ+8Y 9BfFesOsGyNf5wzGYkpqwvM=FlfU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----