From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>,
Thomas Stockheim <tommi@bub-agema.de>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NFS problem - close to open cache consistency broken ?
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:12:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43298F6A.9000500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050915150824.GA24870@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:50:49AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
>
>
>>close-to-open is a convention, not a specification, so it's really up to
>>the client developers to implement what they think is right.
>>
>>
>
>You can't turn off cache revalidation checks while someone else on the
>client has the file open. Wouldn't that would make close-to-open
>useless in a lot of cases?
>
Perhaps, but close-to-open still covers cases that the normal cache
revalidation does not. There are still windows possible with the
normal attribute cache which close-to-open handles. Some of this
depends upon the attribute cache timeouts...
ps
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-15 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-15 13:50 NFS problem - close to open cache consistency broken ? Lever, Charles
2005-09-15 14:19 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-15 15:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2005-09-15 15:12 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
[not found] <12528729.1126796454117.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-09-15 15:14 ` Thomas Stockheim
[not found] ` <18266122.1126803664464.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-09-16 7:22 ` Thomas Stockheim
[not found] <6063053.1126674084242.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-09-15 7:47 ` Thomas Stockheim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-14 2:22 Lever, Charles
2005-09-13 9:04 Thomas Stockheim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43298F6A.9000500@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tommi@bub-agema.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.