Re: Good, recent FS comparison?

[Tyler <pml@dtbb.net>]

You'd be best off trying some tests of your own, using files of the size 
and quantity you expect to use on a regular basis.  I would consider 
ext3, xfs, and reiser3/4... and run some tests with them.  We've had 
really good luck using XFS on large raids, I personally had a bad 
experience with reiserfs 3, it lost data on a USB based drive, as if it 
were never even there, even after trying the recovery tools.

Regards,
Tyler.

Ewan Grantham wrote:

>I've just setup a nice, 6-disk, USB-2 300 Gig/disk array, and was
>prepared to follow my normal pattern of installing ext3 as the
>filesystem. However, I saw the interview with Hans Reiser about
>ReiserFS4, and am now wondering if reiser has really improved enough
>to use it, or if ext3 is still the way to go?
>
>Any thoughts?
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>  
>


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.0/103 - Release Date: 9/15/2005