From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Masover Subject: Re: why does reiserfs list get so much spam? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:24:16 -0500 Message-ID: <432B0DD0.80206@slaphack.com> References: <432A9BFD.10700@mch.one.pl> <20050916104129.GA11025@kruemel> <432AA409.5070006@interia.pl> <432AAA38.9000102@mch.one.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Mierzwa?= Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com =A3ukasz Mierzwa wrote: > Dnia Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:40:22 +0200, Gregory Maxwell > napisa=B3: >=20 >> On 9/16/05, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> >>> yeah, but it is to be used by the end-user. >>> >>> the archive will be still filled with spam. >>> >>> not everyone who wants to know about reiser subscribes to the list; most >>> of the people would just use the archives. >> >> >> I actually subbed to the list because I was frustrated by spam in the >> archive. >> Whomever runs the archive should at least just pipe it through spam >> assassin. If some legitimate messages are lost from the web archive it >> could not be worse than what we have now, an archive made nearly >> useless from excessive spam. >> >=20 > If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list > You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com, > it's just that it is not configured good enough. Can spamassassin be configured "good" enough? I use dspam: http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ There are some articles about why dspam has a fundamentally better design than spamassassin, and why in general statistical filters beat manual-rule-based ones like spamassassin.