From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: why does reiserfs list get so much spam? Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:32:12 +0200 Message-ID: <432B0FAC.4050905@mch.one.pl> References: <432A9BFD.10700@mch.one.pl> <20050916104129.GA11025@kruemel> <432AA409.5070006@interia.pl> <432AAA38.9000102@mch.one.pl> <432B0DD0.80206@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <432B0DD0.80206@slaphack.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: David Masover Cc: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Mierzwa?= , reiserfs-list@namesys.com David Masover schrieb: (...) >>If You will look in the headers of messages that You get from this list >>You will see that there is spamassassin running on thebsh.namesys.com, >>it's just that it is not configured good enough. > > > Can spamassassin be configured "good" enough? > > I use dspam: > > http://www.nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam/ > > There are some articles about why dspam has a fundamentally better > design than spamassassin, and why in general statistical filters beat > manual-rule-based ones like spamassassin. Yeah spamassassin can work extremely well. I guess these articles are based on the quality of spamassassin which checks spam from this list? :) And it's not really true that spamassassin is a manual-rule-based filter only. -- Tomek http://wpkg.org