From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [QUESTION] The cost of local interrupt enable/disable
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 23:00:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <432C2169.2090300@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello, guys.
I'm curious about the cost of local_irq_enable/disable()'s on various
architectures. I found a freebsd discussion thread by googling which
says that each takes 3 cycles on i386 (very cheap), but for Pentium4,
people are talking in the order of several hundreds cycles. Are these
correct? How about other architectures?
TIA.
--
tejun
next reply other threads:[~2005-09-17 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-17 14:00 Tejun Heo [this message]
2005-09-17 14:32 ` [QUESTION] The cost of local interrupt enable/disable Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=432C2169.2090300@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.