From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4331CDC2.1080300@namesys.com> References: <200509201542.j8KFgh2q011730@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <43304AF2.8080404@namesys.com> <17200.21620.684685.966054@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <17200.21620.684685.966054@gargle.gargle.HOWL> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Nikita Danilov Cc: Nick Piggin , Alan Cox , thenewme91@gmail.com, Christoph Hellwig , Denis Vlasenko , chriswhite@gentoo.org, LKML , ReiserFS List , Nate Diller Nikita Danilov wrote: >Hans Reiser writes: > > Horst von Brand wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Funny that the "texbook algorithms" aren't used in real life. Wonder why... > > > > > > > > Try BSD. If the BSD book can be believed, they use"texbook algorithms". > >The "textbook" one-way elevator (as indeed exemplified by FreeBSD's >src/sys/kern/subr_disk.c:bioq_disksort()) has well-known weaknesses. For >example, > > dd if=/dev/zero of=FILE > >can easily monopolize device queue and starve accesses to the blocks >with low block numbers. > > > > > ;-) > >Nikita. > > > > Yes, and one can compensate for them fairly cleanly. I can't say more without the customer releasing the code first.