From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43320DE5.9080802@cornell.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:50:29 -0400 From: Ivan Gyurdiev MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl MacMillan CC: "'Stephen Smalley'" , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jbrindle@tresys.com Subject: Re: [ SEPOL/SEMANAGE ] Boolean record References: <200509211833.j8LIXGYs013694@gotham.columbia.tresys.com> In-Reply-To: <200509211833.j8LIXGYs013694@gotham.columbia.tresys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov >Not certain what you mean - in the case of the policy server, the client >might be running on a different machine than the server. That means that >these functions would have to do some form of RPC using a wire protocol. You >can look at the old policy server snapshot to see this. > > I mean... the functions in *_record.h pack and unpack records, and don't do anything else of significance - they don't retrieve the record, or parse the record, or anything. As such, I don't see why you'd be using RPC on them - there's no reason for a client to be invoking those functions on a different machine. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.