From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
To: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:36:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43399124.8020706@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.09.27.06.35.35.834134@smurf.noris.de>
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
>>The thing is, rsync is bad - it will happily put
>>duplicate, redundant, and especially unwanted data to your repository,
>>especially when the shared GIT repositories happen.
>
> Speaking of which -- is anybody working on that one?
>
> I find myself in need of a multiuser shared repository that cannot
> be corrupted (i.e. I want to prevent the users from removing objects,
> and replacing a ref with something that is not a child of the sha1 that's
> already there should also be prevented).
>
Yes. Actually just the protocol spec so far. Although, progress has been
interrupted by the process of moving to the SoCal area from Fla.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-27 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 16:32 rsync deprecated but promoted? Zack Brown
2005-09-25 17:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-09-25 19:06 ` Martin Coxall
2005-09-26 13:32 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 14:41 ` Brian Gerst
2005-09-26 16:36 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 16:47 ` Brian Gerst
2005-09-26 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-26 16:38 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 16:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-11-10 23:17 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-26 16:44 ` walt
2005-09-26 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-26 19:23 ` walt
2005-09-26 20:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2005-09-26 20:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-26 22:13 ` Daniel Barkalow
2005-09-26 22:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-26 20:43 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-27 6:35 ` hared GIT repos (was Re: rsync deprecated but promoted?) Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-27 7:13 ` shared GIT repos Junio C Hamano
2005-09-27 8:45 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-27 9:59 ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-09-27 10:29 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-27 15:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-09-27 18:36 ` A Large Angry SCM [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43399124.8020706@gmail.com \
--to=gitzilla@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smurf@smurf.noris.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.