From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Subject: Re: vs, can you port to 2.6.13 and put the port on our website as part of analyzing the latest patches added to the -mm series and their impact on reiser4 performance Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:05:27 +0400 Message-ID: <433C02B7.5070309@namesys.com> References: <1127914812.12894.96.camel@laptop> <200509281825.49873.vitaly@namesys.com> <1127921286.12894.106.camel@laptop> <433ABD7B.1010903@slaphack.com> <1127932340.12894.149.camel@laptop> <5d8b7b90509281213c95e30c@mail.gmail.com> <200509281952.j8SJq9Uo007371@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <433AFDF6.3070404@namesys.com> <5d8b7b9050928133842241311@mail.gmail.com> <433B019C.7000302@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <433B019C.7000302@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Hans Reiser Cc: Islam Amer , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Fionn Behrens , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello Hans Reiser wrote: > ;-) > > Thanks, > > Hans > > Islam Amer wrote: > >>On 9/28/05, Hans Reiser wrote: >> >> >>>Check out the latest cfq in the latest kernel, it is much better than >>>the others for most applications. Anticipatory used to be the best, but >>>cfq-3 is better now. >>> >>> >>> >>Yes I always had my eyes on the applicable parts of -ck patchset >>becasue they showed good promise ( upto my limited understading ). I >>just needed an educated opinion. Thanks. >> >>And I had to drop using the genetic-as because it oopsed with >>reiserfs in some kernels. >> >>Problem is lots of experimental patches in -mm series hurt throughput >>and performance and reiser4 users have to suffer. Otherwise we have to >>go through the slightly non-trivial procedure of patching the vanilla >>kernel. >> reiser4 for 2.6.13 can be obtained at ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.13/