From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Oglesby Subject: Re: iosched (was Re: Full of surprises - A reiser4 story from userland) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:01:34 -0500 Message-ID: <433C3A0E.7020400@teleformix.com> References: <1127914812.12894.96.camel@laptop> <1127921286.12894.106.camel@laptop> <433ABD7B.1010903@slaphack.com> <1127932340.12894.149.camel@laptop> <5d8b7b90509281213c95e30c@mail.gmail.com> <200509281952.j8SJq9Uo007371@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <433AFDF6.3070404@namesys.com> <5d8b7b9050928133842241311@mail.gmail.com> <433B3B8B.5090007@slaphack.com> <5d8b7b905092902343f3c2ce8@mail.gmail.com> <433C36CC.7050003@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <433C36CC.7050003@slaphack.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com David Masover wrote: > Islam Amer wrote: > >>> IIRC, don't vanilla and -mm have some somewhat substancial internal >>> differences that could require manual changes? I could be wrong >>> though, I've never even looked at the diffs/patches for vanilla vs >>> -mm. >>> >> >> That's what I am pointing to. The patches might apply cleanly or have >> a few FAILED hunks that can be fixed easily by hand. But what do I >> know about the changes made to the vfs layer etc.. >> I could break something without knowing it. > > > Maybe I did, but I've had a relatively sane experience with it so far... > > Yet, Namesys has put out a 2.6.13 patch, so I'll be switching to that > next time I have a reason to compile. > > I'm running two amd64 boxes and one Pentium 2 on Reiser4, and will > soon be putting it on a Powerbook. > By this weekend I'll have a Gentoo 2005.1 install running on a Sun Ultra II workstation (dual processor, 64-bit). I'll let you guys know how the 2.6.13 patch goes. --Dan