From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <433C3DE7.2010208@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:17:59 -0400 From: Daniel J Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Smalley CC: "Christopher J. PeBenito" , SELinux Mail List Subject: Re: apmd policy References: <1127933375.32172.79.camel@sgc.columbia.tresys.com> <1128018969.27495.127.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> In-Reply-To: <1128018969.27495.127.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Stephen Smalley wrote: >On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 14:49 -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > > >>In the apmd.te, what is the difference between the apm_t and apmd_t >>domains? The naming make it very confusing. By looking at the TE rules >>and file contexts, I'm guessing that apm_t is an interactive program. >> >> > >Yes, looks that way. /usr/bin/apm is the client program, /usr/sbin/apmd >is the daemon, and they each have their own domain. man 1 apm describes >the user command on Fedora. > > > Hopefully apmd will be going away and replaced with gnome_power_manager. Dan -- -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.