All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Yet another scsi_cmnd leak?
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 15:28:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <433C4E7A.7010205@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0509291538520.6137-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>

Alan Stern wrote:
> James:
> 
> This report is based on 2.6.14-rc2-git6.  The code in your scsi-misc-2.6 
> git tree is somewhat different (and I don't know which is more current), 
> but it still contains the same bug.
> 
> 
> In scsi_prep_fn, a request can get deferred if scsi_init_io fails to 
> allocate an sg table.  When this happens, the scsi_cmnd isn't released and 
> the request is not marked DONTPREP.
> 
> Then when scsi_prep_fn is called again, the request may be killed for 
> a number of reasons.  The code branches to the kill: label near the end of 
> the routine, which returns BLKPREP_KILL.
> 
> Isn't it true that when this happens, the scsi_cmnd allocated during the
> original prep will never be released?
> 
> It appears that scsi_prep_fn is undecided about whether or not the request
> is allowed to have a scsi_cmnd already.  The jumps to kill: seem to assume
> that it isn't, but the code for allocating a new scsi_cmnd tests for an
> existing one first.
> 

The gotos used to be just a return BLKPREP* and were added so I did not 
have to write DID_NO_CONNECT or unplug multiple times :) I think you are 
right and we need to further unwind what a previous prep had done 
becuase when we return with BLKPREP_KILL we only hear about this command 
again if it's request has a end_io function or waiting completion.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-29 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-29 20:02 [BUG] Yet another scsi_cmnd leak? Alan Stern
2005-09-29 20:28 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2005-09-29 20:31   ` Mike Christie
2005-10-03 15:34   ` Alan Stern
2005-10-04 15:51     ` Mike Christie
2005-10-14 15:23       ` [PATCH] Fix leak of Scsi_Cmnds Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=433C4E7A.7010205@cs.wisc.edu \
    --to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.