From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Oglesby Subject: Re: reiser4 for 2.6.13 is available on our website Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 22:03:11 -0500 Message-ID: <433CAAEF.2050700@teleformix.com> References: <433C23A2.9020403@namesys.com> <1128031794.10856.155.camel@gentoo> <433C6B7E.40201@namesys.com> <433CAA2F.2030708@teleformix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <433CAA2F.2030708@teleformix.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Dan Oglesby Cc: Gregory Maxwell , Hans Reiser , Jake Maciejewski , =?UTF-8?B?xYF1a2FzeiBNaWVyendh?= , "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" , vs Dan Oglesby wrote: > Gregory Maxwell wrote: > >> On 9/29/05, Hans Reiser wrote: >> >> >>> It works on non-amd64, will fix amd64 tomorrow I hope. >>> >> >> >> No, it fails on FC4/x86 here to complie as well, with the same >> failure mode. >> >> >> > Errors from my vanilla 2.6.13.1 kernel + ReiserFS4 patch compile tonight: > > fs/reiser4/super_ops.c: In function `reiser4_dirty_inode': > fs/reiser4/super_ops.c:176: warning: long long unsigned int format, > oid_t arg (arg 2) > > fs/reiser4/plugin/file_ops_readdir.c: In function `readdir_common': > fs/reiser4/plugin/file_ops_readdir.c:635: warning: long long unsigned > int format, oid_t arg (arg 2) > > fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c: In function `delete_object_unix_file': > fs/reiser4/plugin/file/file.c:2991: warning: long long unsigned int > format, oid_t arg (arg 2) > > fs/reiser4/plugin/dir_plugin_common.c: In function `rem_entry': > fs/reiser4/plugin/dir_plugin_common.c:207: warning: long long unsigned > int format, oid_t arg (arg 2) > > fs/reiser4/plugin/space/bitmap.c: In function `bnode_check_adler32': > fs/reiser4/plugin/space/bitmap.c:506: warning: long long unsigned int > format, bmap_nr_t arg (arg 2) > > Compile finished with no other ReiserFS related errors. > > This was during a stage 1 install on Gentoo 2005.1 on a Sun Ultra II > workstation (dual processor, 64-bit). > > # gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, > ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1, pie-8.7.7.1) > > Are the failed compiles all on machines running GCC 4.0? > > --Dan Nevermind, I just saw Jake's email (failed on gcc 3.4.4). --Dan