From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j8U5qbNs024868 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:52:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from postoffice9.mail.cornell.edu (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j8U5kjCQ027182 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:46:45 GMT Received: from [192.168.2.105] (cpe-24-59-125-231.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.125.231]) by postoffice9.mail.cornell.edu (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j8U5kvwF005826 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:46:58 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <433CD370.2070008@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:56:00 -0400 From: Ivan Gyurdiev MIME-Version: 1.0 To: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: Re: Linking to semanage References: <433CA7CA.6000207@cornell.edu> <433CB22C.20808@cornell.edu> In-Reply-To: <433CB22C.20808@cornell.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > Okay, this test compiled a while ago... and now it won't link. I don't > understand why - can someone who knows something about linking give me > a hint? I hope I didn't break static linking with my patches somehow > (can't see how)... Hmm..apparently order of arguments to gcc matters for static linking. I did not know that... reordering things differently makes it work. -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.